BALIK KE MUKA UTAMA

Are we heading towards another May 13? Rustam A. Sani


Maklumbalas

I am at the risk of being accused of being an alarmist if I say that I am seeing disquieting similarities in the situation of ethnic relations in our society today with that of the period just before the race riots of May 13, 1969.

The broad patterns of the two periods appear to me to be too painfully similar. Both periods began with heightened rivalries and conflicts among Malay political leaders (more accurately among the leaders of Umno, sometimes with the leaders of Pas nudging from the sidelines to complicate matters further). The immediate effect of such a conflict is the staging of the “holier-than-thou” game among the various factions of Malay political leaders.

I could detect the early rumbles of the game to the time when everyone of the leaders were involved in the act of reminding Malays that their situation is far from “secure” – such as reminding them that the aims of the NEP is yet to be realized and they are in imminent danger of being derailed by the efforts of other communities. In the recent case, this reminder was necessitated by challenges coming from Anwar’s reformasi and Pas’ revival as evidenced by the outcome of the 1999 general elections.

In the conduct of the game, it is usually economic issues – such as business opportunities and corporate ownership of the Malays – that take center stage, mainly because of their immediate appeal to ordinary citizens. When that normal political gestures are not adequate any more, and leaders have to draw out the kris or sob shamelessly at political podiums, then you can almost be certain that the political struggle has come to an almost desperate stage.

When the game being played on the economic stage appears insufficient, than some “sideshows” would also be staged – generally dealing with some “cultural” or “nationalistic” issues. In “normal” situations, Malay political leaders are quite unconcerned with issues such as the Malay language – or are even contemptuous of the “negative” role the language can play in serving the needs of the industrial job market.

But under such desperate situations as we are in today, these very same leaders would be claiming credits for their respective roles in “empowering” the Malay language by enhancing, for example, legal capabilities of organizations such as the Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka to enforce the usage of the language. The most potent tool of this “holier-than-thou” game, however, is still religion itself.

The claim to be the defender of the “pure” tenets of the religion appears to be still the most powerful ideological basis for political discourse in this country – in fact it has been the “gist” of the struggle between Umno and Pas all along. In recent years, however, the Abdullah Badawi formulation of “Islam hadhari” has been stealing the wind away from Pas’ claim of being the vanguard of “pure” Islam – thus causing the Islamic party to warm up to Mahathir, offering to help him in these desperate times, despite Mahathir’s treatment of both Anwar dan Pas itself in the recent past.

Much have been said by Umno leaders in denying the existence of such conflict and disunity among leaders of the party these days. The progress of the Abdullah-Mahathir conflict and the difficulty to bring the conflict to any form of finality, however, make it very difficult to believe the claims.

All the factions involved in the conflict, be they open or concealed, seem to have adopted the very same issues we have mentioned above, claiming that their rivals have committed sins such as: selling away the national dignity, not helping Malay businessmen enough, not respecting the national language enough, not helping the Palestinians enough, not defending the rights of Muslims in Malaysia enough – and so on and for forth.

Extreme positions have been taken and extreme words have been uttered by players of the game. As to be expected, the atmosphere has caused non-Malay sectors of the society to be alarmed. As the disunity among the Malay leadership is interpreted as sign of weakness it has encouraged the non-Malay sectors to react in defense of their own positions.

The progress and exchange of actions and reactions on both sides have simply heightened the sense of alarm among different sections of the society even further. Remember, most reactions from the non-Malay section itself are sometimes no less steep in their racial postures and overtones, for given the dominant racialist nature of Malaysian politics, the tendency towards racialist articulations and perspectives is hardly the monopoly of just the Malays.

This is exactly the “disquieting” political atmosphere that I have alluded to. The intra-ethnic group conflicts have now overflowed to involve the other ethnic groups as well – and has transformed the conflicts to be inter-ethnic in nature. This is what I meant by “the pre-May 13 situation” as I remembered it. Soon the confusion would be participated by even bigger spread of groups – university students, cultural groups, trade unions, professional groups, etc.

After that it would only take the adventurism of one group or one leader – for example, one draw of the kris or one “victory march” of any kind – to turn the already strained atmosphere into a flagrant one. And, presto, there you have it: May 13. Is there any way that the disquieting development of this strained political atmosphere can be arrested (no pun intended here!) from progressing to its “logical” conclusions? Perhaps another “Operasi Lalang” could just do it – to the pleasure of the power that be!

Both ways, however, they are not going to be pleasant for those of us who still have some hope for justice and democracy to flourish in this country.

The more logical and lasting solution, I believe, would be to eradicate the racialist nature of Malaysia politics itself. But this is easier said than done – and would there be any takers? The very experienced politician Tengku Razaleigh (Ku Li), for example, has recently advised Anwar Ibrahim that his choice of political party (Parti Keadilan Rakyat) is wrong because it would not win him the support of any particular ethnic group.

More recently the last glimmer of hope to register an ideological (as opposed to racial) political party (Parti Sosialis Malaysia) has been dashed by the decision of the highest court of the land.
Maklumbalas

 

Komen boleh di buat secara mudah klik sini untuk borang maklumbalas, editor1@umno-reform.com atau hubungi 012-6544762