Mahathir Mohamad has mounted a string of attacks
against Mr Badawi
A long-brewing row between Malaysia's
former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad and his
chosen successor, Abdullah Badawi, appears to be
coming to a head, the BBC's Jonathan Kent writes.
The joke doing the rounds in Malaysia at the moment
is that Mahathir Mohamad is suffering from PPMS -
Post Prime Ministerial Syndrome.
The symptoms, say the wags, include irritability,
emotional outbursts and a tendency to criticise
everything and everyone.
When he retired in October 2003 he promised not to
interfere in government. But in the last year Dr
Mahathir has trained his famously acerbic tongue on
his former colleagues, including the man he chose to
be his successor, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad
Badawi.
"There must be issues that really provoke him," says
A. Kadir Jasin, former editor of the New Straits
Times newspaper group.
"Those four issues are the sudden rise in the number
of import permits for cars which he claimed affected
the national car project, Proton; the sale of a
motorcycle company by Proton, the removal of
Proton's chief executive and the cancellation of the
bridge to Singapore," Mr Kadir believes.
'The limit'
The common thread between all these issues is that
of Mahathir's legacy.
For more than two decades he single-mindedly drove
Malaysia towards industrial development through a
combination of large scale state intervention (such
as launching pet projects like Proton) and by
building a coterie of favoured businessmen to whom
were handed government projects and lucrative
monopolies. In the process he won a legion of
admirers around the developing world.
I have helped many people up only for them to stab
me in the back... I'm in the habit of choosing the
wrong people
Mahathir Mohamad
Abdullah Badawi broke with Dr Mahathir's penchant
for mega-projects to concentrate on problems like
rural poverty and education while rebuilding
institutions debased during his predecessor's tenure
- the police, the judiciary and the civil service.
Matters started to come to a head in May after the
government abandoned plans for a new bridge to
Singapore - a project Dr Mahathir had championed
when he was in office - on the grounds that it might
contravene international law.
"This is the limit," Dr Mahathir declared then. "To
surrender your sovereignty to Singapore as if you
are scared of them... This is a 'half past six
country' with no guts."
By June he had ratcheted up the rhetoric, announcing
publicly that he regretted appointing Mr Abdullah as
his successor.
"I have helped many people up only for them to stab
me in the back," Dr Mahathir said. "I'm in the habit
of choosing the wrong people."
TV response
By the beginning of August a whispering campaign
against members of Abdullah Badawi's immediate
family had gathered momentum. Dr Mahathir, telling
reporters he was in fear of being arrested, alleged
that Mr Abdullah's son-in-law, Khairy Jamaluddin,
was handing out government contracts and determining
policy.
Mr Badawi has defended his family and his
administration
After months of resolutely refusing to be drawn, Mr
Abdullah went on national television to confront his
detractors. "I chose to keep quiet because I didn't
want to quarrel with [Dr Mahathir] in the
newspaper," he said, and defended his family.
His son, Kamaluddin Abdullah, whose company Scomi
was caught up in the nuclear technology for Libya
scandal, has made a fortune in the oil industry.
"Kamal has never used his relationship with me to
advance in business," said his father.
As for his son-in-law, Khairy Jamaluddin, Mr
Abdullah countered: "People say I do the things as
Khairy says. There is no such thing."
That did not silence Dr Mahathir. "There are
several... things which I will come out with, one at
a time, [including] evidence of corruption," he told
a news conference last week, as he dismissed Mr
Abdullah's response.
"All he was saying was that 'I'm a good man... I'm a
religious man, I wouldn't do this'. But specific
answers, there were none," Dr Mahathir said.
'Not protected'
The expression often used to describe the smoke and
mirrors of Malaysian politics is wayang kulit,
shadow puppetry.
The root of the dispute is about Mahathir needing to
act to prevent too much of his past unravelling,
leaving him possibly open to prosecution
R. Sivarasa
"It's the politics of patronage and power - it's
about the control of money and the control of power,
that is the root of the problem," said P.
Gunasegaram, of The Edge, an independent and
outspoken business weekly.
R. Sivarasa, a prominent human rights lawyer and
vice-president of the opposition National Justice
Party, agrees that it is about legacy in the widest
sense.
Because although Dr Mahathir is casting aspersions
about his successor, of the two men he is the far
more ready target - not least over the issue of
state funds being used to bail out one of his sons'
companies during the August 1997 financial crisis.
"The root of the dispute is about Mahathir needing
to act to prevent too much of his past unravelling,
leaving him possibly open to prosecution," Mr
Sivarasa said. "He needed to see the system
absolutely under control, even after his departure.
He's now realised that Abdullah is not protecting
him and he's now moving for a solution."
Come November, Abdullah Badawi will face the only
people who can unseat him; the 2,500 delegates to
the annual general assembly of his United Malays
National Organisation (UMNO).
There are many in the party frustrated that Mr
Abdullah has reduced the flow of government
contracts that oil its political wheels. But in Mr
Abdullah's favour is the party's feudal loyalty to
its leader - which may count for even more than
money when the time comes to vote.
"He's got the power of incumbency and if you look at
the history of UMNO politics, no-one has managed to
unseat an incumbent," Mr Gunasegaran said.
If Mr Abdullah survives November's party assembly,
Dr Mahathir might indeed find his world unravelling.
For he may be judged to have made his move and
failed. And as the old adage has it, if you move to
strike the king strike well, for if he lives he will
have your head.
|